What Is The Expense Of Rh Factor Test

Stillosigkeit als Gestaltungsprinzip?

Schon lange fällt mir in katholischen, kirchenmusikalischen oder speziellen Orgelforen auf, dass dort die Frage, welcher Art Kirchenmusik sein sollte, für heftige Diskussion und oft genug für Entzweiung sorgt. Mich als Kirchenmusiker in Diensten einer großen deutschen Erzdiözese überrascht das nicht, stellen diese virtuellen Dispute doch nichts weiter dar als die Verlängerung eines Streites, dem man zwar selten offen (dafür dann aber mit überraschender Heftigkeit), aber oft genug unterschwellig in den Pfarrgemeinden begegnet.

Dabei ist zu beobachten, dass die Argumente stets in folgende Richtungen laufen: die einen fordern ausschließlich klassische Kirchenmusik (der Begriff Klassik is an analogy to classicism in architecture, where this Designation is as pertinent. But there are classics in this sense actually in the music? What exactly is classic in music?), The other open call for all if only the quality is. And already there - an aside - is sadly lacking at times impressive indeed. The third group has it easy: they must not specify style (and is therefore hardly any attack), but calls generally modern and contemporary image.

Time and again, then in the discussion the statement that the church indeed - thank God! - Have made no statement about the type and style of church music, and so yes anything is possible. Harald Schützeichel formulated

can "In principle, any music can be used within the service, from Gregorian chant to jazz. Of course there is music that is appropriate for worship and not very suitable. It is the quality. "¹

he reaps prompt opposition by the renowned Austrian liturgist Philipp Harnoncourt, incidentally, the brother of the renowned conductor Nikolaus Harnoncourt. An opposition in the match no less a figure than Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, when he writes:

"In fact, music is supposed to serve the Christian liturgy, must follow the Logos, specifically: You must be a reasonable assignment to be the word in which the Logos has responded. It can be solved, as instrumental music, not from the inner direction of this word, which releases an infinite space, but also attracts distinctive lines. You must, by its very nature, andes than music to usher in rhythmic ecstasy, in the ecstatic stupor, in the sensual excitement [...] [...]."²

Apart from that I ask myself once more, why the word theologians Christ is always so hard on the tongue, raises the question of how to clarify these statements, indicating at first only a general direction. Here, too, to help further official ecclesiastical texts, in the German speaking and must be ignored on a regular basis:

"A Church of composition is the more religious and liturgical, the more it approaches in their investment, their spirit and their humor to the Gregorian chant and, conversely, it is even less of the temple worthy, as moving away from this model. The ancestral Gregorian chant should therefore be used in abundance at the scale of worship functions again.

all may be convinced that the church does not lose its luster, even if it is accompanied only by this type of music. In particular, we see to it that the Gregorian chant by the people re-established will, so that the faithful in the celebration of the praise of God and the holy mysteries back vivid position, as was the case earlier. "

These words are the Motu Proprio Tra le sollecitudini of St. Pope Pius X. taken from 1903. The quoted today as often as Vatican II large parts of this document, almost literally, and sets:

"The Church of the Gregorian chant regarded as that of the Roman liturgy singing; therefore he is liturgical in their actions, if indeed the same conditions exist to take the first place. "³

is certainly not meant that in future only Gregorian chant should be sung. But at least here is unambiguously confirmed that represents for the Church of the chorale and the elaborate polyphony, a key criterion for assessing the quality of church music compositions. This confirms the already cited Joseph Ratzinger once again, this time 2007, as Pope Benedict XVI. In his Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis :

"Finally, I would like, although I am aware of the different orientations and the very commendable different traditions that, according to the request of the Synod Fathers of the Gregorian chant is brought to the appropriate application, since this is the actual song the Roman liturgy. [...]

More generally, I ask that future priests are prepared at the time of the seminar on understanding the Mass in Latin and to celebrate and to use Latin texts and use the Gregorian chant. One should not overlook the possibility in mind that even the faithful are taught to know the most common prayers in Latin and to sing some parts of the liturgy in Gregorian style. See "

We, the Church is the musical development of vast space, but also sets clear limits. Or, to put it in Joseph Marx. "Not everything that sounds, is music"

We might add: "... and not everything that is music, is suitable as a church musician in the service of the liturgy." I would like to see more priests to rediscover again the language of the Church, and type of boundless self-expression vain Schrammel groups are not yet in a stage of the liturgy. The killer argument that there is no binding definition, is not to hold any event.

I have this issue in further contributions will still attempt to intensify.
_____
¹) Schützeichel: Where should I go? On the situation of church music in the German language area, in StdZ 209 (1991)
²) Joseph Ratzinger: Theology the liturgy. Collected Works vol 11, p. 561; Herder 2008
³), Vatican II, Sacrosanctum Concilium Constitution on the Liturgy